Turing Test Vs Chinese Room Experiment

People outside the room slide chinese characters under the door and searle to whom chinese writing is just so many meaningless squiggles 1 is able to create sensible.

Turing test vs chinese room experiment.

Do not think alike. Now the big question that searle asks is well i the person inside the box or the person inside the room don t understand chinese. On the other hand according t o american philosopher john searle said that the turing test was inadequate. The difference is that the chinese room argument is not intended as a test.

Searle goes on to say the point of the argument is this. So when the chinese expert on the other end of the room is verifying the answers he actually is communicating with another mind which thinks in chinese. And mikhail about the chinese room experiment and the turing test. If searle s room can t pass the turing test then there is no other digital technology that could pass the turing test.

Searle s chinese room argument is a challenge to the validity of the turing test. Insists that if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck it s a duck. In fact you re realizing something like a machine that would pass turing s test. The chinese room has all the elements of a turing complete machine and thus is capable of simulating any digital computation whatsoever.

In the experiment searle imagines himself in a room acting as a computer by manually executing a program that convincingly simulates the behavior of a native chinese speaker. In both rooms there are slips of paper with messages written in chinese. The argument and thought experiment are now generally known as the chinese room argument. The turing test and the chinese room.

The program enables the person in the room to pass the turing test for understanding chinese but he does not understand a word of chinese. In both rooms there are two audio logs of a discussion between t o m. To show it john searle proposed the mental experiment of the chinese room that consist in a person that doesn t know chinese closed in a room with the manuals of rules and symbols to translate the chinese. On the surface they both seem to be similar tests.

Outside of the room someone give to him through a slot texts in. If the man in the room does not understand chinese on the basis of implementing the appropriate program for understanding chinese then neither. In the turing test the particular behavior that is tested is holding a conversation in natural language. Instead searle s chinese room thought experiment is an argument to refute that a machine can be considered truly intelligent.